Sunday, May 7, 2017

#28 - Blood for Dracula



see entry #27 for why this is here and empty right now

--------

EDIT - 3/30/19 - I knocked both this and Flesh for Frankenstein out while playing a game just to have them and get them done - I guess they were shot back to back to a degree that Udo and one of the other main characters from Frankenstein basically finished that movie, cut their hair shorter, and went right into this one.

very similiar to Flesh, this one features some gratutious sex, gore, horror, and humor.

when watching movies with accents this thick I almost want subtitles but evidently they weren't even on the Criterion disk I had scrounged up back two years ago - (I made a temp copy which I will now delete - I know I got it from the Library system but neither of these were easy to find - of course now I'd probably Amazon Video films that I can't find that are still out there like "The harder they fall"

It was a pretty weak take on the Dracula theme as a whole - but so was Frankenstein - but they're done and the blog is updated -

I have one more I'm sorta not looking forward to but I will get on with it shortly I suspect

#27 - Flesh for Frankenstein



Honestly I don't think I can watch this or Dracula (#28) right now

They're just BAD....

I'm going to put "placeholder" blog entries in here - at some point I'll get to them but I'd rather move on for the time being

----------------

UPDATE 3/30/19 - in an attempt to clean out the baffles, as it were before #100, and because I'm 3 days away from my next film coming in, I finally watched this one -

I didn't know whether to be repulsed or laugh at this thing - I remember it being called a cult classic growing up - (and I had no idea who Andy Warhol was - basically he had nothing to do with this but as a presenter.  Basically we have a gorefest of a sexually explicit film.   The Baron is played by the well known actor Udo Kier - (Lord, his IMDB is crazy big) - but as a whole, this is one I wanted to just get out and get it done - then I gotta do Dracula and probably the unspeakable one but I will get thru it. 

not even gonna update the twitter - LOL

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

#26 - The Long Good Friday


First funny trivia of note - I almost watched this on Good Friday, which would have been a hoot :D

This was a clever 1979 British Gangster film I had never heard of, starring Bob Hoskins, Helen Mirren (in the youngest role I've seen her in so far) and for a little extra boot, Eddie Constantine, who was our detective from Alphaville - (#25) - so he shows up twice in a row

It's a pretty good gangster whodunit with a 70's soundtrack and some pretty thick accents - the Criterion release is out of print - but the DVD I got from the Library had some extra features including an excellent documentary about the making of the film with all the principals, the director and the writer.

I guess this was Bob Hoskins breakout role - the film was made and then bought by George Harrison's film company (Handmade Films) for release in 1980 - Helen is excellent here in a role as the Gangster's Moll, (and much more) - We also get just the briefest peek of Pierce Brosnan here in his first feature film role.

The British Gangster genre isn't well known to me - (neither is the Italian American Mafia genre.  I'm ashamed to say I haven't seen any of the Godfather Trilogy ever) - but as a film it kept you guessing up to the end and engaged you with it's fast pace and I enjoyed it thoroughly - the Soundtrack reminded me of one of those Golan-Globus productions of the 1980's - just a little over the top like someone found their first synthesizer and cranked it up but it worked.

The one shot I really liked is at the end but I won't discuss it just in case you want to see the film :)

RB

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

#25 - Alphaville


This one was interesting - a Futuristic Sci-Fi Noir film out of France - Did not see that coming...

Long story short - you have a society (Alphaville) run by a sentient massive computer, and folks working against it while the AI subverts emotions and thoughts in the populace, etc

Lots of inspiration here for other futuristic films - I thought I would like it more than I did but I was tired when watching it, struggled to understand totally what they were going for, and in the end found myself reading the Wikipedia entry to be sure I understood what happened.

I did like some of the hotel scenes which were massive tracking shots of 2-4 minutes including a trip in an elevator - (which was shot from an adjacent elevator with a glass wall) - the entire film plays out on a conventional background with futuristic lingo that reminds me of the bad fiction I used to write in grade school - But...not a terrible film but def. not one I'd buy for myself  - I didn't love it and often found myself checking how much longer I had to go before I was done

the Criterion edition is out of print and had no special features to speak of anyways

RB

Sunday, April 2, 2017

#24 - High and Low


Wife is out of town so I was able to fit one more in - now I gotta wait for Netflix again or la Library

So Kurosawa is one of my favorite directors - I've already done my entry on Seven Samurai and what an excellent film it is, and I have at least one book on Kurosawa in my library.  However, after an aborted attempt at watching all his cinema thru from beginning to end, I gave up after the first Eclipse series and stuck to his Samurai and period pieces, as these were my favorite genres.

Of course, while I had not seen THIS film, he does do an excellent job with contemporary period material as well, including the magnificent Ikiru which I will get to later on in this blog someday.

Here we have a detective/crime flick - a kidnapping of a wealthy executive's son has occurred - except it later turns out it's his chauffeur's son - Thus begins a terrible morality tale as not only does the boy's life hang in the balance, but several other lives could be ruined if the ransom is paid.  Kurosawa takes us on this journey with two of his principle actors, Toshiro Mifune, as the executive Kingo Gondo, (what a name with Western connotations, eh?)  and Tatsuya Nakadai as the inspector in charge of the case.  Although the film runs 2 hrs and 20 minutes, it moves at a brisk pace.   As I understand it, this was based on a Western Cop novel from 1959, (the 89th precinct series called King Ransom) but of course, this is not the first time nor the last that Akira will borrow from Western sources for his material.

Some things that stick out to me - the title in Japanese is Heaven and Hell, and you get that - the executive lives high on a hill overlooking the poorer parts of Yokohama, and almost like a feudal lord, towers above them on a hill where they could virtually see into his living room.   He has servants, drivers, and a substantial share of stock in the company he is attempting to acquire.   The Hell, of course, is the lower depths of Japanese society.  One scene in particular reminded me of Night of the Living Dead, with heroin addicts standing up shakily as if to devour prey that walks inside.

There is also a club scene of Americans both Black and White dancing and partying together in a way I don't think you'd have seen in an equivalent American film in 1963, but maybe the younger generation in their Rock and Roll movies might have seen it.  I guess cause it's so rare in these early 60's films it jarred me just a tiny bit although desegregation of the Armed Forces had occurred by then.

What I also note is that Gondo, for all his executive excesses, is really a salt of the earth kind of guy - he is fighting other executives because he wants their shoes to be better quality, not cheaper - he can repair and fix things with his own toolkit, probably the only one of the executives to ever have real experience working with his hands

Gondo doesn't come across as a guy this deserves to happen to, and in the end, you don't walk away feeling the villains had some nobility or statement they were trying to make thru their suffering at the low end of society.   I have read essays where they speculate he was trying to reply to the "nihilism of the then-rising Japanese New Wave" which you would see in the Noir cinema and Seijun Suzuki a little later in the 60's.

In any case, this film is near the end of Kurosawa's principal output (the stretch from the 1950's to 1970)  - he would only do about 3 more films between this one (1963) and 1980's Kagamusha, which brought him back to international fame at the end of his career.  During this time he would suffer a career flop, a suicide attempt, and a job directing a Russian film after Japanese funding dried up for him.   In any case, it's a great modern style Japanese Detective film and a worthy entry in the Kurosawa canon

My Netflix leaves out the 2nd disk - (A headache I'm going to remedy in the future by looking for library editions again) - but there's the Kurosawa documentary "It is wonderful to create" which is with most Kurosawa films, talking about the film on the DVD - an audio commentary by Kurosawa scholar Stephen Prince and some interviews with Mifune and other actors.   This is such a pretty film in 2.35 to 1 - but dont' just take my word for it - check out the trailer at criterion.com

Saturday, April 1, 2017

#23 - Robocop


Ok...first off - I really don't understand how this got in the Criterion Collection - I mean...not really but this is our third film of the last four to be in the mid 80's and I guess it's considered a Cult Classic but I remember it as actually being a hit - but then I was probably a freshman in high school

So this is MAYBE the first time I remember seeing very close to the time it came out - I probably saw it on HBO or the like cause I wasn't 17 and couldn't see a rated R film - In my memory, it was just another sci-fi robotic movie like the Terminator/T2 series - (in fact, I might have seen this with my mom and her husband who took us to see the original Terminator)

One today can see the parallels to modern society - The Corporations taking over public services and providing inferior service - (such as the recent expose on private prisons by by the publication Mother Jones) - I mean, it's a cool movie - and I got to see an MGM blu-ray edition of it - but I dunno - to me it's not Criterion worthy - in any case, it's out of print now so meh - but readily available in other editions by MGM and the like - and it is on blu-ray which is what Netflix gave me

some special features for this DVD have made it to other editions - It is extremely bloody and violent - and I'm not sure if I saw the uncut version (that could have gotten an X rating) or some of the less gory stuff - but anyways it was #23 and I knocked it out - and now I'm going to take a walk in the sun :)

There's a lot of commentary on this film on Wikipedia - and a ton of good trivia in the IMDB site so I won't get too deep into it here but hey, it's a fun film on an afternoon - to this day I still haven't wasted time with the remake - so there you go

RB

Friday, March 31, 2017

#22 - Summertime


This was a beautiful film, shot almost entirely outdoors in Venice - it's no wonder that tourism doubled in the years after, or that the Director, David Lean ended up getting a 2nd home there where he stayed part of the year.

A lonely secretary goes to Venice, in the form of Katherine Hepburn -there she ends up falling for an Italian who sweeps her away, but of course there must be tragedy in these things - I had never heard of the film before now, but it definitely inspired me to want to go and see Venice for myself.

According to source, 90% of this was shot outdoors - Venice is front in center the entire film and you are immersed in some wonderful scenic shots in what must be one of the most romantic cities in the world.

Although I didn't know David Lean by name, I certainly know several of the movies he would make after this one - The Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia, etc...his last five films would be big long epics - this was his last short film, but he captured a time and place in Venice that probably doesn't exist anymore except in the romanticized imagination and for that I am grateful

AND, hey, i was a little surprised to find the morality of this film to not exactly be Ozzie and Harriett - Adultery plays a role here - and while some parts were censored for certain countries, the full effort is here.  

I could say a lot about Katherine Hepburn's performance, but the truth is, this is really the first film I've seen her in that I've paid attention to - No doubt though if this film were made today, it'd feature a much younger woman than Kat, who was near 40 by the time she did this film.   Today's filmmakers have no respect for middle-aged actresses - Katherine here does give the impression of the spinster who used to believe in love and doesn't anymore - and she does it with very little dialogue, which is something most modern filmmakers and actresses wouldn't pull off well, IMHO

This DVD IS still in print although it really has no extra features to speak of - maybe someday they'll release a restore HD version - the city of Venice alone would make it worth the effort

RB