Wednesday, April 19, 2017

#26 - The Long Good Friday


First funny trivia of note - I almost watched this on Good Friday, which would have been a hoot :D

This was a clever 1979 British Gangster film I had never heard of, starring Bob Hoskins, Helen Mirren (in the youngest role I've seen her in so far) and for a little extra boot, Eddie Constantine, who was our detective from Alphaville - (#25) - so he shows up twice in a row

It's a pretty good gangster whodunit with a 70's soundtrack and some pretty thick accents - the Criterion release is out of print - but the DVD I got from the Library had some extra features including an excellent documentary about the making of the film with all the principals, the director and the writer.

I guess this was Bob Hoskins breakout role - the film was made and then bought by George Harrison's film company (Handmade Films) for release in 1980 - Helen is excellent here in a role as the Gangster's Moll, (and much more) - We also get just the briefest peek of Pierce Brosnan here in his first feature film role.

The British Gangster genre isn't well known to me - (neither is the Italian American Mafia genre.  I'm ashamed to say I haven't seen any of the Godfather Trilogy ever) - but as a film it kept you guessing up to the end and engaged you with it's fast pace and I enjoyed it thoroughly - the Soundtrack reminded me of one of those Golan-Globus productions of the 1980's - just a little over the top like someone found their first synthesizer and cranked it up but it worked.

The one shot I really liked is at the end but I won't discuss it just in case you want to see the film :)

RB

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

#25 - Alphaville


This one was interesting - a Futuristic Sci-Fi Noir film out of France - Did not see that coming...

Long story short - you have a society (Alphaville) run by a sentient massive computer, and folks working against it while the AI subverts emotions and thoughts in the populace, etc

Lots of inspiration here for other futuristic films - I thought I would like it more than I did but I was tired when watching it, struggled to understand totally what they were going for, and in the end found myself reading the Wikipedia entry to be sure I understood what happened.

I did like some of the hotel scenes which were massive tracking shots of 2-4 minutes including a trip in an elevator - (which was shot from an adjacent elevator with a glass wall) - the entire film plays out on a conventional background with futuristic lingo that reminds me of the bad fiction I used to write in grade school - But...not a terrible film but def. not one I'd buy for myself  - I didn't love it and often found myself checking how much longer I had to go before I was done

the Criterion edition is out of print and had no special features to speak of anyways

RB

Sunday, April 2, 2017

#24 - High and Low


Wife is out of town so I was able to fit one more in - now I gotta wait for Netflix again or la Library

So Kurosawa is one of my favorite directors - I've already done my entry on Seven Samurai and what an excellent film it is, and I have at least one book on Kurosawa in my library.  However, after an aborted attempt at watching all his cinema thru from beginning to end, I gave up after the first Eclipse series and stuck to his Samurai and period pieces, as these were my favorite genres.

Of course, while I had not seen THIS film, he does do an excellent job with contemporary period material as well, including the magnificent Ikiru which I will get to later on in this blog someday.

Here we have a detective/crime flick - a kidnapping of a wealthy executive's son has occurred - except it later turns out it's his chauffeur's son - Thus begins a terrible morality tale as not only does the boy's life hang in the balance, but several other lives could be ruined if the ransom is paid.  Kurosawa takes us on this journey with two of his principle actors, Toshiro Mifune, as the executive Kingo Gondo, (what a name with Western connotations, eh?)  and Tatsuya Nakadai as the inspector in charge of the case.  Although the film runs 2 hrs and 20 minutes, it moves at a brisk pace.   As I understand it, this was based on a Western Cop novel from 1959, (the 89th precinct series called King Ransom) but of course, this is not the first time nor the last that Akira will borrow from Western sources for his material.

Some things that stick out to me - the title in Japanese is Heaven and Hell, and you get that - the executive lives high on a hill overlooking the poorer parts of Yokohama, and almost like a feudal lord, towers above them on a hill where they could virtually see into his living room.   He has servants, drivers, and a substantial share of stock in the company he is attempting to acquire.   The Hell, of course, is the lower depths of Japanese society.  One scene in particular reminded me of Night of the Living Dead, with heroin addicts standing up shakily as if to devour prey that walks inside.

There is also a club scene of Americans both Black and White dancing and partying together in a way I don't think you'd have seen in an equivalent American film in 1963, but maybe the younger generation in their Rock and Roll movies might have seen it.  I guess cause it's so rare in these early 60's films it jarred me just a tiny bit although desegregation of the Armed Forces had occurred by then.

What I also note is that Gondo, for all his executive excesses, is really a salt of the earth kind of guy - he is fighting other executives because he wants their shoes to be better quality, not cheaper - he can repair and fix things with his own toolkit, probably the only one of the executives to ever have real experience working with his hands

Gondo doesn't come across as a guy this deserves to happen to, and in the end, you don't walk away feeling the villains had some nobility or statement they were trying to make thru their suffering at the low end of society.   I have read essays where they speculate he was trying to reply to the "nihilism of the then-rising Japanese New Wave" which you would see in the Noir cinema and Seijun Suzuki a little later in the 60's.

In any case, this film is near the end of Kurosawa's principal output (the stretch from the 1950's to 1970)  - he would only do about 3 more films between this one (1963) and 1980's Kagamusha, which brought him back to international fame at the end of his career.  During this time he would suffer a career flop, a suicide attempt, and a job directing a Russian film after Japanese funding dried up for him.   In any case, it's a great modern style Japanese Detective film and a worthy entry in the Kurosawa canon

My Netflix leaves out the 2nd disk - (A headache I'm going to remedy in the future by looking for library editions again) - but there's the Kurosawa documentary "It is wonderful to create" which is with most Kurosawa films, talking about the film on the DVD - an audio commentary by Kurosawa scholar Stephen Prince and some interviews with Mifune and other actors.   This is such a pretty film in 2.35 to 1 - but dont' just take my word for it - check out the trailer at criterion.com

Saturday, April 1, 2017

#23 - Robocop


Ok...first off - I really don't understand how this got in the Criterion Collection - I mean...not really but this is our third film of the last four to be in the mid 80's and I guess it's considered a Cult Classic but I remember it as actually being a hit - but then I was probably a freshman in high school

So this is MAYBE the first time I remember seeing very close to the time it came out - I probably saw it on HBO or the like cause I wasn't 17 and couldn't see a rated R film - In my memory, it was just another sci-fi robotic movie like the Terminator/T2 series - (in fact, I might have seen this with my mom and her husband who took us to see the original Terminator)

One today can see the parallels to modern society - The Corporations taking over public services and providing inferior service - (such as the recent expose on private prisons by by the publication Mother Jones) - I mean, it's a cool movie - and I got to see an MGM blu-ray edition of it - but I dunno - to me it's not Criterion worthy - in any case, it's out of print now so meh - but readily available in other editions by MGM and the like - and it is on blu-ray which is what Netflix gave me

some special features for this DVD have made it to other editions - It is extremely bloody and violent - and I'm not sure if I saw the uncut version (that could have gotten an X rating) or some of the less gory stuff - but anyways it was #23 and I knocked it out - and now I'm going to take a walk in the sun :)

There's a lot of commentary on this film on Wikipedia - and a ton of good trivia in the IMDB site so I won't get too deep into it here but hey, it's a fun film on an afternoon - to this day I still haven't wasted time with the remake - so there you go

RB